Notice & Comment

Results for: Lubbers

Notice & Comment

Please Spare Us the Return of “Formal” Rulemaking, by Jeffrey S. Lubbers

On December 7, the Department of Justice held an unusual “summit” on reforming the Administrative Procedure Act in its Great Hall.  The keynote speaker was Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen. The major theme of its three panels was that it was past time for the APA to be “modernized.”  Various suggestions were heard ranging […]

Notice & Comment

A Good Student Question on the Appointments Clause—And a Judge’s Answer, by Jeffrey Lubbers

Sometimes a student question leads to an interesting discovery. In my Administrative Law class, I was covering the issue of appointment of officers and discussing the important Appointments Clause cases of Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988) (appointment of the independent counsel (“IC)” under the Ethics in Government Act) and Lucia v. SEC, 138 […]

Notice & Comment

Patricia Wald’s Great Legacy, by Jeffrey Lubbers

The world (and especially the world of Administrative Law) suffered a great loss on January 12 when Patricia Wald succumbed to cancer at the age of 90. The Washington Post’s excellent obituary was entitled, “Patricia Wald, pathbreaking federal judge who became chief of D.C. Circuit, dies at 90.” She was a pathbreaker in more ways […]

Notice & Comment

(If the Supreme Court Agrees) The SG’s Brief in Lucia Could Portend the End of the ALJ Program as We Have Known It, by Jeffrey S. Lubbers

My symposium entry is an updated version of my February 26, 2018 post to this blog. I should also note that I signed the amicus brief authored by Professor Pierce and his colleagues, primarily because it urges the Court not to agree with the SG’s brief concerning removal protection for ALJs.]  Anyone interested in preserving […]

Notice & Comment

Auer Deference with a Foreign Twist, by Jeffrey Lubbers

For some years, there has been a lot of debate (including in a symposium in this blog) about the continued viability of the Auer/Seminole Rock deference doctrine, under which, subject to various exceptions, courts are supposed to give an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations “controlling weight, unless that interpretation is plainly erroneous or inconsistent […]

Notice & Comment

SG’s Brief in Lucia Could Portend the End of the ALJ Program as We Have Known It, by Jeffrey S. Lubbers

Anyone interested in preserving the independence of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) should be alarmed at Solicitor General Neal Francisco’s brief (nominally) on behalf of the SEC in the case pending at the Supreme Court, Raymond J. Lucia Petitioners v. The Securities and Exchange Commission.  I say “nominally” because the front page of the brief itself […]

Notice & Comment

GAO Finds EPA Actions in WOTUS Rulemaking to Violate Anti-Propaganda and Anti-Lobbying Prohibitions, by Jeffrey S. Lubbers

There was an interesting development yesterday in the controversy over EPA’s aggressive social media campaign in support of its “Waters of the United States” rule. This rulemaking, conducted in conjunction with the Army Corps of Engineers, on was the subject of a panel at the recent ABA Adlaw Section Fall meeting. The Final Rule was […]

Notice & Comment

OMB Circular A-4 Should Require Robust and Transparent Pre-Proposal Stakeholder Collaboration, by Kevin L. Bromberg and Adam M. Finkel

*This post is part of a symposium on Modernizing Regulatory Review. For other posts in the series, click here. Circular A-4 should include a mandatory process of robust and transparent pre-proposal public collaboration for rules that remain subject to review under the revised EO 12866 guidance. Multiple executive orders subsequent to EO 12866 have required more substantive collaboration with affected persons, […]

Notice & Comment

Resurrecting the Dead: Sanofi Aventis v. HHS

May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule?  The Department of Health and Human Services (“HSS”) arguably did just that in promulgating its rule specifying the administrative dispute resolution (“ADR”) process[1] for conflicts between drug makers and certain […]

Notice & Comment

The Administrative Conference of the United States Mourns the Passing of Anna Williams Shavers

The members and staff of the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) mourn the recent passing of Anna Williams Shavers, the Associate Dean for Diversity and Inclusion and Cline Williams Professor of Citizenship Law at the University of Nebraska College of Law. Professor Shavers was affiliated with ACUS for nearly nine years—first as a […]

Notice & Comment

No Surprises? Texas Medical Association v. HHS: Part III

Summary: A recent district court decision, Texas Medical Association v. HHS, Dkt No. 6:21-CV-425 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2022), accessible on WESTLAW at Medicare & Medicaid Guide ¶307259 (C.C.H.), 2022 WL 597141, has troubling implications both for agencies’ traditional authority to create rebuttable presumptions and for the scope of Administrative Procedure Act section 553’s “good […]