Tag Archives: Seminole Rock/Auer deference

Will the Supreme Court Revisit Deference Doctrines This Term?

by Jennifer Mascott — Friday, Oct. 6, 2017@jennmascott

Yesterday in his Supreme Court Relist Watch, John Elwood highlighted the Supreme Court’s unusual action this past summer on a cert petition regarding Chevron deference. Mr. Elwood observed that the Supreme Court relisted—again— Scenic America, Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 16-739, which garnered attention this summer when the court called for a reply . . […]

Does Auer/Chevron Deference Apply to State Agency Interpretations of Federal Law?

by Chris Walker — Thursday, Sept. 21, 2017@chris_j_walker

In Grand Canyon Trust v. Energy Fuels Resources (U.S.A.) Inc., Judge Waddoups of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah concluded that a state agency is entitled to “some deference” as to an interpretation by the Utah Department of Air Quality (DAQ) of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations. Here’s the key part […]

A Status Update on Criticisms of Auer and Chevron Deference

by Chris Walker — Monday, Sept. 11, 2017@chris_j_walker

Back in April the Georgetown Center for the Constitution and the Institute for Justice organized a terrific conference entitled Challenging Administrative Power. The Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy generously agreed to publish the papers presented at the conference, and that conference issue is forthcoming early next year. For my short conference contribution, I decided […]

Judicial Deference under the Regulatory Accountability Act

by Chris Walker — Wednesday, July 26, 2017@chris_j_walker

Since I last blogged about the Portman-Heitkamp Regulatory Accountability Act being reported favorably out of committee in May, there hasn’t been any movement on the legislative front. A number of additional administrative law scholars, however, have weighed in, and the legislation continues to get serious attention in policy circles. For instance, Cass Sunstein has a generally […]

Reflections on Seminole Rock: The Complete Symposium

by Aaron Nielson — Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2016@Aaron_L_Nielson

Last month, Notice & Comment hosted a two-week symposium on Seminole Rock (or Auer) deference. The complete symposium is now available on SSRN. Here is the link. And here is the Table of Contents: Introduction by Aaron Nielson The Lost History of Seminole Rock by Sanne H. Knudsen & Amy J. Wildermuth Henry Hart’s Brief, […]

Conclusion: Reflections on Seminole Rock

by Aaron Nielson — Friday, Sept. 23, 2016@Aaron_L_Nielson

Our symposium on Seminole Rock deference has now come to an end. I will take a few moments, however, to thank all of the participants. By my count, 30 different contributors posted as part of this symposium. We are fortunate that so many folks, with so many different perspectives, were willing to take the time […]

After Auer?, by Jeffrey Pojanowski

by Guest Blogger — Friday, Sept. 23, 2016

I planned to post solely about how judicial review would operate without Auer deference. I recently ruminated in a forthcoming Missouri Law Review symposium paper about a future without Chevron, and I think post-Auer and post-Chevron futures offer interestingly different implications. But along the way I found myself thinking about the origins of Auer deference. […]

Contemplating a Weaker Auer Standard, by Kristin E. Hickman

by Guest Blogger — Friday, Sept. 23, 2016

In thinking about the future of Auer deference, I begin with a critical supposition, that stare decisis will prevail and the Court will not overturn Auer, at least not based on separation of powers principles.* Retaining Auer, however, does not mean that its doctrine will remain static. Drawing especially but not exclusively from Christopher v. […]

Why SOPRA is Not the Answer, by William Funk

by Guest Blogger — Thursday, Sept. 22, 2016

The Separation of Powers Restoration Act, or more easily known as SOPRA, is not a complicated bill. If enacted, it would amend the Administrative Procedure Act to require courts to decide de novo all questions of law, whether constitutional, statutory, or regulatory. As the House Report makes abundantly clear, the intent is to overrule statutorily […]

Congress Must Act to Restore Accountability to the Regulatory Process, by Senator Orrin G. Hatch

by Guest Blogger — Thursday, Sept. 22, 2016

“[I]t is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.” These simple, straightforward words constitute Chief Justice John Marshall’s foundational definition in Marbury v. Madison of “the judicial Power” that the Constitution vests in the federal courts. Repeated in countless court decisions, law review articles, and civics textbooks, […]