Notice & Comment

Author: Bernard Bell

Notice & Comment

Remedying Appointment Clause Violations:  Special Counsels (Part III)

This is the third of three posts assessing Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of an indictment against Donald Trump and his two co-conspirators because Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed as a special counsel.  This three-part series has focused on the appropriateness of the Judge’s wholesale invalidation of the Special Counsel’s action. As noted in my initial […]

Notice & Comment

Remedying Appointment Clause Violations:  Special Counsels (Part II)

This is the second of three posts assessing Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of an indictment against Donald Trump and two co-conspirators upon finding the Attorney General’s appointment of Jack Smith violated the Appointments Clause.  This three-part series assumes that Judge Cannon correctly decided the constitutional question and, instead, assesses the appropriateness of the Judge’s wholesale […]

Notice & Comment

Remedying Appointment Clause Violations:  Special Counsels (Part I)

“[T]he aspiration to effective individual remediation for every constitutional violation represents an important remedial principle, but not an unqualified command.”  Richard H. Fallon, Jr. & Daniel J. Meltzer, New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies, 104 Harv. L. Rev. 1731, 1789 (1991) Judge Aileen Cannon recently dismissed an indictment against Donald Trump and two co-conspirators upon […]

Notice & Comment

Linke v. Freed: Weighing In On Public Official’s Social Media Sites

Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers […]

Notice & Comment

Resurrecting the Dead: Sanofi Aventis v. HHS

May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule?  The Department of Health and Human Services (“HSS”) arguably did just that in promulgating its rule specifying the administrative dispute resolution (“ADR”) process[1] for conflicts between drug makers and certain […]

Notice & Comment

Campaign Legal Center v. DOJ — FOIA Postscript to Department of Commerce v. New York (Part III)

Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action?  Earlier this year, the D.C. Circuit answered in the affirmative. Campaign Legal Center v. […]

Notice & Comment

Campaign Legal Center v. DOJ — FOIA Postscript to Department of Commerce v. New York (Part II)

Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action?  Earlier this year, the D.C. Circuit answered in the affirmative. Campaign Legal Center v. […]

Notice & Comment

Campaign Legal Center v. DOJ — FOIA Postscript to Department of Commerce v. New York (Part I)

Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action?  Earlier this year, the D.C. Circuit answered in the affirmative. Campaign Legal Center v. […]

Notice & Comment

On the Waterfront:  The Solicitor General Weighs In

This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. New Jersey, that Congressionally-ratified interstate compacts obligating states to ongoing obligation include an implicit right of unilateral withdrawal from the compact and assumption of a compact agency’s authority by the withdrawing state within its state boundaries.  The Solicitor General’s argument ignores state practices in […]

Notice & Comment

NAB v. FCC: And Now A Message From Our Sponsors: Part II

In National Assn of Broadcasters v. FCC, No. 21-1171 (July 12, 2022), a D.C. Circuit panel invalidated an FCC rule designed to ensure that material aired by broadcasters was properly identified when coming from a foreign government.  The regulation’s fatal flaw was its requirement that broadcasters check two government databased to ascertain whether the entity […]

Notice & Comment

NAB v. FCC: And Now A Message From Our Sponsor — Part I

For nearly a century, Congress has required broadcasters to identify the sponsors or providers of broadcast programming airing on their stations.[1] Implicitly such identifications should be truthful and non-deceptive.  That imperative, truthful, non-deceptive identification of sources, is all the more critical to the extent that a program originates from a foreign governmental entity.  Or so the […]

Notice & Comment

Mexican Gulf Fishing v. Department of Commerce: Part II

The National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) published a rule requiring owner and operators of for-hire vessel operating in the Gulf of Mexico to (1) install GPS devices that constantly archived the vessel’s locations, and (2) allow federal fisheries enforcement personnel access to the information.  A group of charter boat captains and owners challenged the regulation, […]

Notice & Comment

Mexican Gulf Fishing v. Department of Commerce: Part I

On July 21, 2020, the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) published a rule requiring owners and operators of for-hire vessel operating in the Gulf of Mexico to submit electronic fishing reports upon their return to port “prior to removing any fish from the vessel” (or within 30 minutes if no fish had been retained). Even […]