Notice & Comment

Author: Bernard Bell

Notice & Comment

A Lemon Cake: Ascribing Religious Motivation in Administrative Adjudications — A Comment on Masterpiece Cakeshop (Part I)

  In Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), the Supreme Court held that the Free Exercise Clause did not require governments to exempt religious adherents from generally applicable laws, even when those laws prohibited self-regarding actions performed as a part of a religious ceremony (namely ingesting peyote).  Id. at 877-79.  Resolving a claim […]

Notice & Comment

TPP. .P

Sometimes the ship of state can be turned abruptly, but sometimes it can’t.  Even though agencies possess great budgetary flexibility, and reallocation of appropriated funds is generally an unreviewable exercise of discretion, see Lincoln v. Vigil, 508 U.S. 182 (1993), a new administration encounter constraints in discontinuing the funding of multiple-year grants made by a […]

Notice & Comment

Hatch-Waxman and Defective Generic Drug Labels: The Disjunction Between Federal Drug Safety Law and State Warning Defect Law (Part II)

In an earlier post I outlined a regulatory anomaly regarding liability for defective drug labels.  Hatch-Waxman expedited entry of generics medications into the market, by relieving generic-brand manufacturers of the need to conduct further testing.  Concomitantly, the statute placed control of the contents of the drug label in the hands of the original recipient of […]

Notice & Comment

Hatch-Waxman and Defective Generic Drug Labels: The Disjunction Between Federal Drug Safety Law and State Warning Defect Law (Part I)

Consider the following hypothetical.  A drug company develops and patents a pharmaceutical to sell under brand-name.  It secures FDA approval and enjoys its patent monopoly for many years.  But after that patent monopoly expires, generic brand-makers flood into the market and undercut the brand-name’s price.  Pharmacists substitute the generic for the brand name.  The label […]

Notice & Comment

Plausible Deniability: Selective Disclosure of Information and FOIA

Unofficial leaking has been in the news recently, and is never far away from public consciousnesses.  But “[g]overnment officials and military officers, from the President on down, routinely authorize leaks for policy or political purposes.”  Jack Nelson, U.S. government Secrets and the Current Crackdown on Leaks 2 (2002), accessible at, https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2003_01_nelson.pdf?x78124. Suppose intelligence officials want […]

Notice & Comment

On the Supreme Court Docket — Guido v. Mt. Lemmon School District: Numerosity Requirements in the ADEA and Other Employment Discrimination Statutes (Part II)

This is the second of two posts regarding Guido v. Mt. Lemmon School District,  Dkt. No. 17-587, currently on the Supreme Court docket for the October 2018 Term.  The case involves the applicability of Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967’s (ADEA) numerosity requirement, 29 U.S.C.A. § 630(b), to public employers. In my prior post […]

Notice & Comment

On the Supreme Court Docket — Guido v. Mt. Lemmon School District: Numerosity Requirements in the ADEA and Other Employment Discrimination Statutes (Part I)

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Guido v. Mt. Lemmon School District.  — U.S. — , 138 S.Ct. 1165 (February 26, 2018).  Presumably, it did so to resolve a Circuit split regarding the application of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967’s (ADEA) numerosity requirement, 29 U.S.C.A. § 630(b), to public employers.  In […]

Notice & Comment

Critiquing Hernandez v. Mesa: Contextual Assessment of Administrative Law’s Potential as an Alternative to Bivens Remedies

On June 7, 2010, border patrol agent Jesus Mesa fatally shot Sergio Güereca, a 15–year–old Mexican national.  Güereca was standing near the cement culvert separating the United States and Mexico.  Hernández and several friends had run up the culvert’s embankment on the U.S. side, touched the border fence, and returned to Mexican territory.  Agent Mesa […]

Notice & Comment

Applying the “Deliberative Process Privilege” to Internal Agency Debates Regarding Communications Strategy

On December 14, 2017, the Federal Communications Commission voted to repeal its Obama-Era net neutrality rules.  The day before the vote, FCC Chair Ajit Pai appeared in a humorous and unconventional “Harlem Shake” video produced by the Daily Caller, a conservative website.  In the video, entitled “7 Things You Can Still Do After Net Neutrality,” […]