Over the last week, the Supreme Court put the administrative state under significant new scrutiny, signaling a turning point in a larger project of consolidating policy decision-making power in the judiciary. One case to spotlight is SEC v. Jarkesy, which raises questions about the future role of agencies in enforcing statutory violations. The Court in Jarkesy held that […]
Given the amount of commentary being addressed to the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, it would appear that the Chevron decision may continue to be one of the Court’s most-discussed opinions even after its demise. But the Court can, and should, seize the opportunity created by Loper Bright to shrink, rather than expand, the number of “doctrines” that […]
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the conservative majority of the Supreme Court finally made good on its threat to overturn the Court’s Chevron doctrine. Since 1984, Chevron has required courts to defer to agency interpretations only after evaluating and passing three steps of analysis: (a) at “Step Zero” – by deciding that Congress has left ambiguities in a statute that (according […]
Today, the Supreme Court decided Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo which overruled Chevron v. NRDC. John Roberts, writing for a 6-3, ideologically divided court, held that Chevron Deference is not compatible with § 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act. The decision comes in the wake of SEC v. Jarkesy, in which the Court held that the Seventh Amendment entitles defendants to a jury […]
On Thursday, the Supreme Court decided SEC v. Jarkesy. The conservative appointees banded together in a 6-3 ruling, concluding that the Seventh Amendment entitles defendants to an Article III jury trial in SEC civil enforcement proceedings. First, John Roberts writes that the relevant SEC enforcement actions implicate the Seventh Amendment because the agency’s antifraud provisions mirror […]
From cancer-causing talc in baby powder to defective ear plugs sold to the military, to sexual assault in the Catholic Church, bankruptcy courts are increasingly becoming the default venue for mass torts. Scholars have sharply debated whether bankruptcy courts are the right venue to decide questions of accountability, to apportion blame, and to set compensation for victims of large-scale corporate wrongdoing. On the […]
As we all await the next administrative law earthquake from the Supreme Court, it may be worth taking stock of just how much the ground has already shifted. In our new article, Major Rules in the Courts: An Empirical Study of Challenges to Federal Agencies’ Major Rules, we provide this analysis. Using a novel dataset […]
On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court held in Connelly v. United States that life-insurance proceeds earmarked by a corporation for redemption of a deceased shareholder’s stock must be included when valuing the corporation for estate-tax purposes. This is a major blow for closely held business succession planning and denies estates a potentially […]
New technologies, including tools driven by artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being used in the workplace for a wide range of purposes such as measuring employee productivity, preventing theft, and monitoring workers. These technologies offer to many companies potential solutions that help optimize efficiencies and support operations, reduce human bias, prevent discrimination and harassment, and […]
On September 29, 2023, shortly after the FTC filed its complaint alleging that Amazon is illegally monopolizing the market for online sales of goods, I wrote a blog in Notice and Comment titled FTC v. Amazon Should Be Khan v. Khan. I began by noting that FTC Chair Khan had obtained her initial notoriety by […]
Clear statement rules are having a moment at the Supreme Court. Recently, in Harrow v. Department of Defense, the Court held that a statutory deadline for an appeal from a Merit Systems Protection Board ruling was non-jurisdictional. In its unanimous ruling, the Court applied a “clear statement rule”: Congress must speak clearly if it means […]
On April 23, 2024, the FTC finalized a trade regulation rule prohibiting employers from enforcing non-compete agreements against workers. In response, business groups sued and Daniel Crane, a law professor at the University of Michigan, published a piece in Notice and Comment that reported on the views of 17 anonymous online volunteers regarding the fate […]
The assault on Chevron has not yet been resolved, but it is next to impossible to believe that the sensible Justices of the Court will go any further than to reaffirm that deciding questions of the scope of agency authority is exclusively for judicial resolution (though perhaps with Skidmore-like attention to the views of the […]
Last week, several business groups including the National Federation of Independent Businesses filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate one of the Department of Labor’s top priorities: a final rule issued in April that updates the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) overtime salary thresholds to ensure that millions more workers are eligible for extra pay if […]
On two occasions, the majority opinion in CFPB v. Community Financial made clear that it was tasked with answering only a “narrow” question concerning the requirements imposed by the Appropriations Clause. Slip Op. at 1, 5. The Court’s answer to that narrow question was relatively straightforward: the Appropriations Clause requires no more than “a law […]