Notice & Comment

Author: Christopher J. Walker

Notice & Comment

Seidenfeld on Livermore on Parties, Presidents, and Agencies (AdLaw Bridge Series)

As I mentioned in my AdLaw Bridge series post last week, I’m slowly catching up* on highlighting the Jotwell Administrative Law Section reviews from the last couple months as part of this series. Here is another terrific Jotwell review, this one by Mark Seidenfeld of Political Parties and Presidential Oversight by Michael Livermore, which was […]

Notice & Comment

Duke Law Journal AdLaw Symposium: Is Intellectual Property Law Administrative Law? (AdLaw Bridge Series)

As I blogged about back in February, Duke Law Journal‘s annual administrative law symposium this year is titled Intellectual Property Exceptionalism in Administrative Law. Video of February’s live symposium is available here. It was a terrific event, and draft papers were very thought provoking. Those papers were published earlier this month, and full issue is available here. […]

Notice & Comment

ABA Highlights Twentieth Anniversary of the Congressional Review Act

On May 26, 2016, the ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice will hold a teleconference marking the Twentieth Anniversary of the Congressional Review Act (CRA). The CRA gives Congress the power to disapprove certain types of “economically significant” regulations before they go into effect. Although previously an afterthought, the CRA has recently taken […]

Notice & Comment

ABA Section to Host Discussion on Federal Sector Personnel Law

The ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, Government Personnel Committee will host two brown bag lunches this month on the latest developments at the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), Office of Federal Operations. These brown bags are part of a larger series of discussions the Government Personnel […]

Notice & Comment

Barnett on the Problems with Administrative Judges (AdLaw Bridge Series)

Especially in light of my interest in immigration adjudication—where immigration judges are administrative judges and not administrative law judges—I was particularly excited to read an earlier draft of Kent Barnett’s Against Administrative Judges, which is forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review. You can download a draft of the paper here, and here’s the abstract: […]