Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Making Broadcast Content Regulation Aggressive Again,” by Stuart Minor Benjamin

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Making Broadcast Content Regulation Aggressive Again,” by Stuart Minor Benjamin. Here is the abstract: The Federal Communications Commission has statutory authority over broadcasting that far exceeds any governmental authority over online platforms, cable television, or newspapers: Every license renewal or transfer depends on the FCC’s determination that it […]

Notice & Comment

The Law of For Cause Removal by Jane Manners and Lev Menand

For the first time in American history, the Supreme Court is poised to decide what it means for the president to remove a principal officer “for cause.” The case—which arises from the attempted removal of Lisa Cook, a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System—has major implications for central bank independence […]

Notice & Comment

There Were Two Tariff Cases Before the Supreme Court. But it Threw One of Them Out. Luckily for Importers and Consumers, It Threw Out the Wrong One, by Harvey Reiter

Lost in the extensive coverage of the Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026 opinion invalidating most of President Trump’s tariffs was the fact that there were two related cases before it[1] and that it had entirely dismissed one of them. The lead case, in fact.  That coverage gap is understandable. The only mention the Court makes […]

Notice & Comment

Newborn Screening Programs: Protecting People, Not Merely Property

In holding that law enforcement officers could not place listening devices on the outside of a public phone booth without a warrant, the Supreme Court famously proclaimed: “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.”  Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967).  That insight provides perspective on two recent decisions regarding the collection and […]

Notice & Comment

The Supreme Court Empowered a Specialty Court to Decide the Fate of Trump’s Trade Agenda

On February 20th, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a large portion of President Trump’s vast tariff regime, holding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the president to impose tariffs. In response, the Trump administration announced its determination to find alternate routes for its America First trade policy. While the […]

Notice & Comment

Justice Barrett’s Remarkable Contribution to the Debate Over “Independent” Agencies, by Bruce Ackerman

Within two months of his arrival in the White House, Donald Trump fired Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission because, in his words, “her position on the agency is incompatible with this Administration’s policies.” Yet the FTC statute permits presidents to fire Commissioners only on a showing of “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or […]

Notice & Comment

The Trouble with Policing Adjudicatory Rulemaking, by Tascha Shahriari-Parsa

This month, two judges made a strong bid—perhaps the strongest of the century—to limit when agencies may make law through adjudication rather than rulemaking. In Brown-Forman Corp. v. NLRB, the Sixth Circuit declined to enforce a bargaining order that relied on Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, which announced a new standard for remedial bargaining orders. […]

Notice & Comment

Only One-Third of Proposed Regulatory Obligations Survive to the Final Rule, by Andrew Leahey

Notice-and-comment rulemaking is the core mechanism through which the public can shape regulation. As such, courts ask whether agencies have responded adequately to significant comments and scholars often examine whether final rules differ from proposals that precede them—but those approaches typically measure change at the level of entire regulations or, more broadly, documents. That is […]

Notice & Comment

Loper Bright and the Future of the Republican Coalition

For more than thirty years, Republicans in all three branches of the national government worked to overturn Chevron and eliminate judicial deference to administrative agencies. As former White House counsel Don McGahn explained, their objective was “to corral the runaway bureaucracy to get judges in place who were actually going to read the law as […]