Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “After Courts: Democratizing Statutory Law,” by Ryan D. Doerfler & Samuel Moyn

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “After Courts: Democratizing Statutory Law,” by Ryan D. Doerfler & Samuel Moyn, which is forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review. Here is the abstract: In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton argued for locating interpretive authority over law separately from those institutions tasked with formulating it. Hamilton’s vision, never […]

Notice & Comment

Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, March 2024 Edition

It’s the end of the semester, so many professors are gearing up to grade final exams and thus seeking opportunities to procrastinate. There’s lot of great new administrative law scholarship to help on that front. Here is the March 2024 Edition of the most-downloaded recent papers (those announced in the last 60 days) from SSRN’s U.S. Administrative […]

Notice & Comment

FTC Rulemaking and the Attorney General’s Committee on Administrative Procedure

In light of the FTC’s vote yesterday to adopt a rule banning non-compete agreements, readers might be interested to see what the Attorney General’s Committee on Administrative Procedure said about FTC rulemaking in its 1940 monograph. The Committee prepared 26 monographs examining the actual practices and procedures of administrative agencies, and this research informed a […]

Notice & Comment

It’s Time To Amend How We Amend The Constitution: Legal Scholars Call For Limited Constitutional Convention

Our Constitution is not and never was perfect. The Framers intended for it to undergo amendment as required to maintain the spirit of the Revolution and to prevent the recurrence of the weaknesses that saddled our government under the Articles of Confederation. Yet, amending the Constitution has become nearly impossible in our current political environment. […]

Notice & Comment

Linke v. Freed: Weighing In On Public Official’s Social Media Sites

Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers […]

Notice & Comment

Too Late in Corner Post: Why the Supreme Court Should Time Bar this Term’s “Sleeper” Administrative Procedure Case, by Susan C. Morse

A North Dakota truck stop opened its doors in 2018. It pays debit card  “swipe fees” to banks at the maximum rate set by Federal Reserve regulations promulgated in 2011. May it challenge the regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act, or APA, as (1) arbitrary and capricious and (2) ultra vires, or in excess of […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: Reopening and congressional ratification

The D.C. Circuit decided two cases last week, National Association of Realtors v. United States, and Hikvision USA, Inc. v. FCC. In National Association of Realtors, appellee—a trade association for the real-estate industry—sought to set aside a subpoena issued by DOJ’s Antitrust Division after the Division closed and then reopened an investigation into some of […]

Notice & Comment

Ranking the Big Tech Monopolization Cases: Some Economists’ Perspectives, by Brian C. Albrecht & Daniel J. Gilman

Antitrust scrutiny of “big tech” is hardly new, but the Justice Department’s recent monopolization case against Apple caps an unprecedented federal antitrust offensive against major tech firms. There are at least five open monopolization matters, beginning with the DOJ’s 2020 Google search complaint, and followed by cases against Facebook/Meta, Amazon, a second case against Google […]

Notice & Comment

Yet Another Way To Rebut Major Questions Doctrine Challenges, by Reed Shaw

In a spirit similar to that of recent great posts in this forum, this blog post suggests yet another way agencies can preemptively insulate certain rules from Major Questions Doctrine (MQD) challenges. In particular, we focus on how overlapping federal, state and international regulatory regimes may reduce the incremental costs of rulemakings, and therefore weigh against a finding […]

Notice & Comment

“Digital Discrimination” Kills Low-Income Broadband Discount Plans, by Dr. George S. Ford

Prior to the COVID pandemic, most broadband service providers (“BSPs”) offered heavily discounted but capable internet plans to lower-income households for about $10 to $15 per month.  Dissatisfied with these market-based solutions, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (“IIJA”) established the “Affordable Connectivity Program” or “ACP.”  Under the ACP, the federal government provides a $30 per month […]