Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit’s Double-Header on Article II

This week the D.C. Circuit sitting en banc heard arguments in its blockbuster (by Washington standards) double-header featuring the appointments and removal implications of Article II. In a nutshell, the cases address whether Article II’s transparency and accountability requirements mean (i) a single head of an executive branch agency must be removable at will (PHH […]

Notice & Comment

The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act

Uniform Law Commission Acts and Projects Part 2 The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act Increasingly, state governments are publishing laws, statutes, agency rules, and court rules and decisions online.  In some states, important state-level legal material is no longer published in books, but is only available online.  While electronic publication of legal material has created […]

Notice & Comment

Why the Trump Hiring Freeze Is Likely Illegal?, by Sam Wice

President Trump’s hiring freeze is likely illegal. In an effort to reduce the size of the federal workforce, President Trump instituted a general hiring freeze on new federal workers. Subsequently, President Trump issued a memo instructing agencies to “begin taking immediate actions to achieve near-term workforce reductions and cost savings, including planning for funding levels […]

Notice & Comment

The New Director-General of the World Health Organization

On May 23, 2017, the World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of the World Health Organization, elected Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus as the new Director-General of WHO.  Dr Tedros, a former Ethiopian Health Minister, is the first African leader of the international organization.  WHO is distinct among international organizations for its ability to initiate both treaties […]

Notice & Comment

An Administration Takes Sides, by Andrew M. Grossman

The eccentricities, let’s say, of the current President obscure something very interesting and important that is occurring now in the regulatory system. So I will try, in my seven or so minutes, to describe what’s changed and why it represents the beginning of a serious reimagining—yes, a serious one—of the regulatory process. As a baseline […]

Notice & Comment

SAS Institute Inc. v. Lee: The Chevron Challenge Below the Surface, and Why Administrative Lawyers Should Sometimes Care About Patent Cases, by Bill Burgess

In 2011, Congress gave the Patent Office new rulemaking power, and created new adjudicative proceedings at the Patent Office before panels of “administrative patent judges.” These proceedings have generated hundreds of new appeals to the Federal Circuit, some of which are exceptionally well-lawyered and present interesting administrative law issues. These cases have recently started to […]

Notice & Comment

Taking the Nuclear Option Off the Table

Last Thursday, fifteen states and the District of Columbia moved to intervene in House v. Price, the case about the ACA’s cost-sharing reductions. At the same time, they asked the court to hear the case promptly. This is a bigger deal than it may seem, and could offer some comfort to insurers that are in […]

Notice & Comment

Update on Portman-Heitkamp Regulatory Accountability Act

On Wednesday, the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee (HSGAC) reported out favorably the Portman-Heitkamp Regulatory Accountability Act. I’ve blogged about this bipartisan regulatory reform legislation here and here, and I have an more in-depth take on the legislation in an essay forthcoming in Administrative Law Review. Earlier this week, moreover, The Regulatory Review (f/k/a RegBlog) […]

Notice & Comment

Litigation Challenging Trump’s Executive Order on Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs

Over at The Regulatory Review today, Scott Slesinger, Legislative Director at NRDC, and Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen, have an essay detailing their lawsuit challenging the lawfulness of the Trump Administration’s Executive Order on Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs. Over at the Library of Law and Liberty blog back in February, Brian Mannix posted […]

Notice & Comment

Barnett and Walker on Coenen and Davis on the New Major Questions Doctrine (AdLaw Bridge Series)

As my co-blogger Aaron Nielson covered in his D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed “postscript” two weeks ago, the D.C. Circuit recently denied rehearing in United States Telecom Ass’n v. FCC, which was the challenge to the FCC’s net neutrality regulations. Among more than one hundred pages of separate opinions concerning the denial, Judge Kavanaugh has a […]