Yale Law School Professor Nick Parrillo must have a crystal ball. His just-posted article, The Endgame of Administrative Law: Governmental Disobedience and the Judicial Contempt Power, seems to have anticipated today’s headlines. The controversies over Trump’s ill-considered Immigration Executive Order, Trump’s summary firing of Acting Attorney General Sally Yates for refusing to defend the […]
In the past few days a number of people have asked me about Judge Thomas Hardiman and administrative law. Each time my answer was, “Well, I actually don’t know.” There has been some good writing on Judge Gorsuch and administrative law, in particular with respect to his recently voiced skepticism toward judicial deference to agency […]
On January 30th President Trump signed an executive order mandating that most executive departments and agencies go on a regulatory diet. The EO requires agencies that create a new regulation to identify two regulations to be repealed. In FY 2017 covered agencies are required to keep the net cost of regulation to no greater than […]
The real life implications of President Trump’s immigration executive orders exploded over the weekend. On Friday, President Trump proclaimed the unwillingness of the United States to accept refugees by suspending the whole overseas refugee program for 120 days and indefinitely suspending that program for Syrian refugees. He also cut off all immigration from seven countries […]
After a six-year hiatus, legally valid recess appointments will likely return in 2017. The Constitution gives “[t]he President [the] Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.” In effect, recess appointments give the President the […]
Standing is a big deal. Most agree, for instance, that the law professors suing President Trump about the Emoluments Clause “pretty clearly lack Article III standing.” Likewise, the States, members of Congress, and interest groups seeking to intervene in PHH Corp. v. CFPB no doubt are going to face a fierce challenge to their standing. […]
As regular readers of this blog know, I have written several posts on the Foreign Emoluments Clause over the past couple months. During that same time, I have been working on an extensive scholarly article on the clause, and I recently posted a draft on SSRN. (Download here: The Foreign Emoluments Clause and the Chief […]
As widely reported this week, the Trump administration has apparently sent memos to several federal agencies — including the EPA, HHS, the Interior Department, and the USDA — ordering them not to issue any press releases, publish new materials on their web sites, or post on their social media accounts. The memo to the EPA apparently […]
Donald Trump’s team has led an insurrection against the dogma of free trade, calling for a revision or dissolution of NAFTA and killing US participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. They promise to “repeal and replace” the prevailing multilateral system with bilateral deals that do a better job of allocating trade gains to the U.S. (and, […]
This post was coauthored by Nicholas Bagley and Adrianna McIntyre. The executive order President Trump signed on Friday does not have any immediate policy effect, but it does call attention to the wide range of administrative actions that a Trump administration could take to change the Affordable Care Act—all without legislation from Congress. We’ve compiled […]
Today, a group of constitutional law scholars apparently plan to file a federal lawsuit alleging that President Trump is violating the Emoluments Clause because his hotels are receiving payments from foreign governments. Although the meaning of the clause is up in the air, roughly speaking the clause prohibits federal officials from taking payments from foreign […]
Today I start a semester-long academic fellowship in Senator Orrin Hatch’s Office to work on judicial nominations and regulatory reform legislation. Due to joining the Senate staff, my blogging (and tweeting) will be limited to conform to these new professional obligations (and the Senate ethics rules). For instance, I won’t be blogging about any potential regulatory reform […]
Eight years ago I was a law clerk for the D.C. Circuit — and I had a great view of the U.S. Capitol. In fact, my view was almost postcard perfect. Further, as you no doubt recall, January 2009 was an eventful time in the city. It does not happen often that a new President […]
There are some misconceptions floating around about what the executive order does and doesn’t do. Let me try to clarify. As I explained in a post last week, “[a]uthority to implement the ACA … is vested in the Secretaries of HHS, Treasury, and Labor—not the President. In the context of the ACA, an executive order […]
At the American Bar Association’s annual Administrative Law Conference in December, I had the privilege of moderating a panel entitled Your Agency Is Not That Special: The Decline of Administrative Law Exceptionalism. The panel consisted of leading experts on administrative law exceptionalism from three distinct regulatory fields: Jill Family for immigration, Kristin Hickman for tax, […]