Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

A Small Step to a Better APA

In 2023, I used this blog to criticize the Supreme Court’s decision in Calcutt v. FDIC as “unnecessary, unfortunate, and unpersuasive, all at the same time.” So I felt vindicated when, last week, in FDA v. Wages & White Lion Investments, the Court clarified that it didn’t really mean what it said in Calcutt. Along […]

Notice & Comment

Is VanDerStok an Accidental Landmark?

Intentionally or not, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bondi v. VanDerStok has the potential to dent the arc of administrative law. As Justice Alito observed in his dissent, the case could end up being a “huge boon for the administrative state.” Below, we explain why.   At issue in VanDerStok was a 2022 rule […]

Notice & Comment

Secret Conditions Move from DOGE to OMB, by Matthew B. Lawrence

As Eloise Pasachoff, Zachary Price, and I describe in a forthcoming essay, the second Trump Administration is implementing unilateral executive control over federal spending—or “appropriations presidentialism”—with a breadth and magnitude that is unprecedented.  Much of the recent public discourse around this appropriations presidentialism has focused on DOGE’s “efficiency” efforts and OMB Director Russ Vought’s assertion […]

Notice & Comment

More Thoughts on Why the Congressional Review Act Applies to EPA “Waivers” of Clean Air Act Preemption, by Michael Buschbacher & Jimmy Conde

Things don’t move fast in Washington—until they do. Just hours after we published our piece explaining why EPA waivers of Clean Air Act preemption are subject to congressional review under the CRA, GAO published a memo of “observations” taking the opposite view. In addition, UC Berkeley Professors Dan Farber and Eric Biber have explained in […]

Notice & Comment

A Major Questions Doctrine Update, by Beau J. Baumann

For several months in 2022 and 2023, I wrote a series of blog posts called “The Major Questions Doctrine Reading List.” These posts came in the aftermath of several high-profile cases involving the MQD. My hope was that I could spotlight good scholarship and provide a shared language for talking about the MQD. For the […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Rethinking the Administrative-Remand Rule,” by Matthew J. Sanders

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Rethinking the Administrative-Remand Rule,” by Matthew J. Sanders, which is forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review. Here is the abstract: With a few exceptions, the federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction over—and only over—“final decisions” of the district courts. There is a little-known but highly consequential rule, known […]

Notice & Comment

The Redressability Problem in FCC v. Consumers’ Research, by Adam Crews

FCC v. Consumers’ Research (set to be argued on March 26) presents the Supreme Court with its latest chance to revitalize the nondelegation doctrine. The case centers on the multi-billion dollar universal service fund (USF) that, by statute, the FCC funds with fees from interstate telecom carriers to pay for various subsidy programs. The en […]

Notice & Comment

Trump Is Wrong on Birthright Citizenship: A Son of Immigrants’ Lesson on the Constitution, by Ediberto Roman

On January 20, 2025, President Trump’s first act was to end birthright citizenship by executive fiat with the “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” executive order. On March 13, 2025, after four federal courts enjoined the implementation of the executive order, the Trump Administration petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to allow him to […]

Notice & Comment

Measured Steps: A Prudent Approach to Google Antitrust Remedies, by George S. Ford

In August 2024, federal district court Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, setting the stage for what could be a watershed moment in tech regulation.  The court found that Google unlawfully maintained its monopoly through exclusive distribution agreements with browser and device companies, sharing ad revenues in exchange […]