Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

DAPA, “Lawful Presence,” and the Illusion of a Problem, by Anil Kalhan

In an essay published earlier this week, Prof. Michael Kagan expresses concern that “one aspect” of the Obama administration’s executive actions on immigration might be vulnerable when the Supreme Court adjudicates United States v. Texas later this year. In particular, Kagan worries that the plaintiffs might “have a valid point” when they assert that the administration’s initiatives—Deferred […]

Notice & Comment

New Regulatory Policy Development: OMB’s Revised Guidance to Federal Agencies on Standards and Conformity Assessment, by Jeff Weiss

On January 27, 2016, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published its long-awaited revision of Circular A-119 on “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities.” The new policy was developed through an interagency process that took into account public input received during two […]

Notice & Comment

An Update on House v. Burwell

In House v. Burwell news, the Obama administration and the House of Representatives have each filed their final briefs on whether Congress has supplied an appropriation for the cost-sharing subsidies. The government has requested oral argument in the case, but a hearing date has yet to be scheduled. What happens when and if the court […]

Notice & Comment

Rethinking Immigration Exceptionalism(s), by David S. Rubenstein

Donald Trump’s suggestion that we temporarily ban Muslim immigrants from entering the country sent shockwaves through the American psyche. Yet even more shocking, to some, is that Trump’s idea might be constitutional. For more than a century, the Supreme Court has crafted and maintained special doctrines for immigration that depart from mainstream legal norms. If […]

Notice & Comment

The Regulatory Coherence Chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Making the Link Between Adherence to Good Regulatory Practice Principles and Promoting International Trade and Regulatory Cooperation, by Jeff Weiss

In November 2015, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) released the full textof the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), a free trade agreement that was negotiated by the United States with eleven countries from Asia and the Americas: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. The Agreement […]

Notice & Comment

U.S. v. Texas SCOTUS Immigration Case: Federalist Society Teleforum Thursday

It’s fitting that during our week-long online symposium on the intersection of immigration law and administrative law here at the Yale Journal on Regulation the Federalist Society will be hosting a teleforum Thursday on United States v. Texas — the challenge to the Obama Administration’s executive actions on immigration that the Supreme Court will hear […]

Notice & Comment

Employment Authorization and Prosecutorial Discretion: The Case for Immigration Unexceptionalism, by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia

The exercise of prosecutorial discretion or “PD” is an important feature in the immigration system. It requires each DHS component to make decisions about whether a person legally eligible for immigration enforcement should still be allowed to reside in the United States on a temporary basis. PD recognizes that in a universe of limited resources, […]

Notice & Comment

FDA’s Memoranda of Understanding, Quasi-Treaties, and their Role in the Future of Global Administrative Law

In my last post, I detailed the kinds of agreements FDA uses with regulatory partners as part of a three-post series that examines FDA through the lens on the growing literature on “global administrative law.” This final post analyzes FDA’s “steepest” commitments with regulatory partners and argues that in the process of contributing to global […]

Notice & Comment

ABA Adlaw Section Hosts Discussion on FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association

MEDIA CONTACT: Angela Petro: Angela.Petro@americanbar.orgor 202-662-1582 WASHINGTON (February 8, 2016) – On February 9, 2016, the Energy Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice will hold a teleconference on the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association(EPSA) decision. Panelists Joel Eisen, Professor of […]

Notice & Comment

Federal Regional Offices and Functional Federalism, by Dave Owen

In a previous post, I described some recent research on the geographic decentralization of staff and authority within federal government agencies. A key conclusion of that research, and of yesterday’s post, is that the realities of federal governance call into question some key pillars of the conventional wisdom about American federalism. This post addresses a […]