Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

North Carolina Board: Much Ado About Nothing, by Joseph M. Sanderson

For all the sound and fury from federalism scholars over the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FTC v. North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, one might have thought that the Supreme Court had sounded the death knell for states’ ability to protect favored industries from market competition. But while North Carolina must now actively supervise […]

Notice & Comment

North Carolina Board: Much Ado About Nothing, by Joseph M. Sanderson

For all the sound and fury from federalism scholars over the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FTC v. North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, one might have thought that the Supreme Court had sounded the death knell for states’ ability to protect favored industries from market competition. But while North Carolina must now actively supervise […]

Notice & Comment

Supreme Court Teleconference Series: King v. Burwell

The Section’s Supreme Court Teleconference Series continues March 5, 2015 from 3:30 – 4:30 p.m. EST with a discussion on King v. Burwell, a challenge to the Administration’s policy on the availability of subsidies through the federal health insurance exchange under the Affordable Care Act.  On March 4, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments for the […]

Notice & Comment

The Court Ignores the Six Sides of Federalism in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, by Jim Saywell

[CJW Note: My coauthor Jim Saywell, who is now clerking for Judge McKeague on the Sixth Circuit and will be clerking for Judge Sutton next year, previously published a terrific short essay on this case (available here). Now that the Court has decided the case against Jim’s position, I invited him to pen this short follow-up.] The Supreme Court last […]

Notice & Comment

The International Health Regulations After Ebola

Although the sharp drop in the number of new Ebola infections has, worryingly, appeared to level off, the international community has made significant progress toward raising funds toward the response, developing and now undertaking widespread testing of vaccines, and implementing measures meant to control the worldwide spread of the disease. All of this leaves the […]

Notice & Comment

Remembering Martha Derthick & The Politics of Ideas

It’s worth taking some time here to note the passing in January of one of the great scholars of regulation and public policy, Martha Derthick (emerita of the University of Virginia Department of Politics). Nice remembrances can be found here, here, and here . Derthick’s work roamed widely through American politics, but of particular relevance […]

Notice & Comment

Yale Law Journal Series on Cost-Benefit Analysis in Financial Regulation (AdLaw Bridge Series)

The latest issue of the Yale Law Journal (and Yale Law Journal Forum) has a terrific series on the hot topic of cost-benefit analysis in financial regulation. I had planned on featuring John Coates’s important article-length contribution in the AdLaw Bridge Series, but Fabrizio Di Mascio over at the Osservatorio AIR beat me to the punch […]

Notice & Comment

USPTO Seeks Public Input on Proposed Patent Quality Changes, by Shannon Allen

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) seeks input from the public to provide guidance regarding enhancing patent quality.  The USPTO is making efforts to improve patent operations and procedures to provide the best work products, to enhancecustomer experience, and to improve existing quality metrics.  Thus, the USPTO is introducing a comprehensive and enhanced […]

Notice & Comment

Agency Interpretation of Admin Law Requirements

When issuing rules, agencies usually avoid the Reg Flex Act (RFA), which requires consideration of regulatory impacts on small businesses and other small entities. My forthcoming article in theAdministrative Law Review explains why and how agencies have avoided providing Reg Flex analyses for over 92 percent of rules. The House recently passed a bill that […]

Notice & Comment

FERC and Demand Response

I’ve been exploring a few issues in energy regulation that Congress is likely to take up this term. Up today: FERC’s efforts to promote demand response in wholesale electricity markets. What is “demand response”? It’s the umbrella term for programs that urge customers to turn off the lights when demand for electricity is extremely high. […]

Notice & Comment

Title II Reclassification: A Reply to Gus Hurwitz

It’s nice to have a level-headed debate on the legal arguments at play in the FCC’s upcoming reclassification of broadband ISPs, an issue that often generates more heat than light. And for what it’s worth, I think Gus Hurwitz and I agree on a lot. In particular, I agree with him that a skeptical court […]

Notice & Comment

Debating Daniel Deacon on Title II Reclassification

Daniel Deacon’s recent Notice & Comment post does a nice job of laying out the legal basis that will likely be used by FCC Chairman Wheeler’s proposed Open Internet (a/k/a net neutrality) rules. And his analysis of this legal basis reflects conventional wisdom. He is right that it is reasonably likely that the courts will […]

Notice & Comment

O’Connell on Sohoni on The Power to Privilege (AdLaw Bridge Series)

Last fall I featured Mila Sohoni’s then-forthcoming University of Pennsylvania Law Review article, “The Power to Privilege,” in this Administrative Law Bridge Series. My post is here, and the article was published last month and can be downloaded here. In this article, Professor Sohoni explores a recent legislative development—from the Affordable Care Act—where Congress has delegated […]