Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

A Stay in King v. Burwell and the “Flowing Dollars” Theory

During oral arguments in King v. Burwell, Justice Alito referred to a few issues that have been covered on this blog. For now, I’d like to focus on his question regarding a potential stay of any government-adverse decision. Regarding the stay, Justice Alito asked Solicitor General Verrilli whether a holding for the petitioner would wreak […]

Notice & Comment

Avoiding Constitutional Avoidance

In parsing Justice Kennedy’s comments about federalism from oral argument in King yesterday, it’s important to notice that federalism principles could affect the outcomes in two very different ways. Most of Kennedy’s comments suggested that threatening the states with the loss of tax credits and the destruction of their individual insurance markets would be unconstitutionally […]

Notice & Comment

Will the Government Get Chevron Deference in King v. Burwell?

The Government is likely to prevail in King v. Burwell if its interpretation of the Affordable Care Act receives Chevron deference. This raises an important question: what influences when Supreme Court justices grant Chevron deference to agencies? Prof. Bill Eskridge and I examined this question in a paper that examined all Supreme Court cases from […]

Notice & Comment

Deferring to the IRS

Given the Chief Justice’s near-silence at oral argument in King v. Burwell yesterday, much will be made of Justice Kennedy’s sensitivity to the argument that accepting the plaintiffs’ interpretation of the statute would raise serious federalism concerns. That’s completely appropriate. But I want to call attention to a different question that Kennedy asked the government’s […]

Notice & Comment

North Carolina Board: Much Ado About Nothing, by Joseph M. Sanderson

For all the sound and fury from federalism scholars over the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FTC v. North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, one might have thought that the Supreme Court had sounded the death knell for states’ ability to protect favored industries from market competition. But while North Carolina must now actively supervise […]

Notice & Comment

North Carolina Board: Much Ado About Nothing, by Joseph M. Sanderson

For all the sound and fury from federalism scholars over the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FTC v. North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, one might have thought that the Supreme Court had sounded the death knell for states’ ability to protect favored industries from market competition. But while North Carolina must now actively supervise […]

Notice & Comment

Supreme Court Teleconference Series: King v. Burwell

The Section’s Supreme Court Teleconference Series continues March 5, 2015 from 3:30 – 4:30 p.m. EST with a discussion on King v. Burwell, a challenge to the Administration’s policy on the availability of subsidies through the federal health insurance exchange under the Affordable Care Act.  On March 4, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments for the […]

Notice & Comment

The Court Ignores the Six Sides of Federalism in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, by Jim Saywell

[CJW Note: My coauthor Jim Saywell, who is now clerking for Judge McKeague on the Sixth Circuit and will be clerking for Judge Sutton next year, previously published a terrific short essay on this case (available here). Now that the Court has decided the case against Jim’s position, I invited him to pen this short follow-up.] The Supreme Court last […]

Notice & Comment

The International Health Regulations After Ebola

Although the sharp drop in the number of new Ebola infections has, worryingly, appeared to level off, the international community has made significant progress toward raising funds toward the response, developing and now undertaking widespread testing of vaccines, and implementing measures meant to control the worldwide spread of the disease. All of this leaves the […]

Notice & Comment

Remembering Martha Derthick & The Politics of Ideas

It’s worth taking some time here to note the passing in January of one of the great scholars of regulation and public policy, Martha Derthick (emerita of the University of Virginia Department of Politics). Nice remembrances can be found here, here, and here . Derthick’s work roamed widely through American politics, but of particular relevance […]

Notice & Comment

Yale Law Journal Series on Cost-Benefit Analysis in Financial Regulation (AdLaw Bridge Series)

The latest issue of the Yale Law Journal (and Yale Law Journal Forum) has a terrific series on the hot topic of cost-benefit analysis in financial regulation. I had planned on featuring John Coates’s important article-length contribution in the AdLaw Bridge Series, but Fabrizio Di Mascio over at the Osservatorio AIR beat me to the punch […]

Notice & Comment

USPTO Seeks Public Input on Proposed Patent Quality Changes, by Shannon Allen

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) seeks input from the public to provide guidance regarding enhancing patent quality.  The USPTO is making efforts to improve patent operations and procedures to provide the best work products, to enhancecustomer experience, and to improve existing quality metrics.  Thus, the USPTO is introducing a comprehensive and enhanced […]

Notice & Comment

Agency Interpretation of Admin Law Requirements

When issuing rules, agencies usually avoid the Reg Flex Act (RFA), which requires consideration of regulatory impacts on small businesses and other small entities. My forthcoming article in theAdministrative Law Review explains why and how agencies have avoided providing Reg Flex analyses for over 92 percent of rules. The House recently passed a bill that […]

Notice & Comment

FERC and Demand Response

I’ve been exploring a few issues in energy regulation that Congress is likely to take up this term. Up today: FERC’s efforts to promote demand response in wholesale electricity markets. What is “demand response”? It’s the umbrella term for programs that urge customers to turn off the lights when demand for electricity is extremely high. […]