Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Justice Department’s Consumer Protection Branch Is Hiring (1/3 deadline)

From the job posting: The Consumer Protection Branch is seeking an attorney to defend the Food & Drug Administration, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and other federal agencies in civil litigation throughout the country. The attorney will defend against high-profile challenges to agency actions, policies, and programs related to food, drugs, medical devices, […]

Notice & Comment

Fifth Circuit Review – Reviewed: Not On Purpose

The en banc Fifth Circuit released some zingers ahead of the holiday season.  In Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Corp., the court of appeals issued a one-paragraph per curiam opinion—accompanied by 166 pages of concurrences and dissents—blessing a $14.25 million civil penalty against ExxonMobil.  The showdown largely focused on standing.  Appellate geeks may […]

Notice & Comment

Van Loon v. Department of the Treasury – A Decision with Important Implications for Bitcoin, by Steven A. Levy

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently issued its decision in Van Loon v. Department of the Treasury, a case that has been closely watched by the press and Bitcoin advocates. As set forth below, this decision has important implications for Bitcoin. In particular, it effectively precludes the federal government from banning Bitcoin under the International Emergency […]

Notice & Comment

Informed agency decision-making is at risk if Supreme Court restricts scope of environmental reviews, by Frank Sturges & Shaun Goho

The scope of federal environmental reviews is at stake when the Supreme Court decides the just-argued case Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County. Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), agencies must analyze the environmental impacts of actions they fund, authorize, or carry out. Those impacts may include both direct impacts from a project as […]

Notice & Comment

Redeploying the Anti-Administrative Toolkit, by Will Dobbs-Allsopp

Over the past several years, the conservative legal movement and corporate interests have enjoyed one administrative law victory after another. Admirers of the administrative state have watched in general dismay as regulators’ ability to protect the public health, the environment, and worker safety and organizing rights has dwindled. Despite their chagrin over these developments, progressives […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “The Great Unsettling: Administrative Governance After Loper Bright,” by Cary Coglianese and Daniel E. Walters

With apologies for the delay in between postings, we’re back! Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “The Great Unsettling: Administrative Governance After Loper Bright,” by Cary Coglianese and Daniel Walters, which is forthcoming in the Administrative Law Review. Here is the abstract: “Chevron is overruled.” These three words surely captured more attention than any […]

Notice & Comment

What Musk and Ramaswamy Don’t Get

I’ve got a new piece in the Atlantic about the soon-to-be Department of Government Efficiency. Musk and Ramaswamy’s claims depend much more on the finer points of administrative law than I would’ve expected! I thought about mental models when Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy released an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal making their first major statement about the […]

Notice & Comment

A Different Perspective on Skidmore Weight After Loper Bright, by Alisa Klein

As Chris Walker has explained, he and Mike Kagan recently filed this amicus brief urging the Ninth Circuit to rehear en banc a case that involves a question of exceptional importance: how to reconcile Skidmore “respect” for an agency’s interpretation with the central holding of Loper Bright. The amicus brief argues that, in “the guise of giving Skidmore ‘respect’ to a precedential statutory-interpretation decision […]

Notice & Comment

The Fifth Circuit’s Nuclear Decision Presents an Opportunity to Resolve Major Confusion about Major Questions, by Jack Jones

In July, the Fifth Circuit ruled in Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) does not have the legal authority to issue licenses for private companies to store spent nuclear fuel at locations away from reactors. The court’s decision rests in part on a cursory and strained application of the major questions doctrine. […]