Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

The End of Chevron Deference in Comparative Perspective, by Leonid Sirota & Edward Willis

The Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright, which overruled the Chevron precedent that courts will defer to reasonable agency interpretations of law, has caused no small measure of controversy. Indeed, the decision has been the subject of political invective along party political lines, with Democrats in particular criticizing the decision. In this note we cannot hope to quell such criticisms, […]

Notice & Comment

Textualism and Longstanding Agency Interpretations: Supplying a Textualist Basis for a Robust Skidmore Doctrine, by Navid Kiassat

Twenty-three years after being resurrected by Mead, Skidmore is seemingly resurgent. As commentators on this blog have noted, the Loper Bright Court’s express references to Skidmore suggest—aside from situations where the “best reading” of a statute is a delegation of interpretive authority—that Skidmore will be the primary test used to evaluate agency statutory interpretation going forward.  But is Skidmore really any different than de novo review? Scholars and […]

Notice & Comment

ACUS Update: New Model Rules of Representative Conduct Published, ACUS Committees Convene to Develop Draft Recommendations & More

It’s been a busy summer at the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), and we have even more exciting work coming down the pipeline this fall. Read on to learn more about our recently published Model Rules of Representative Conduct, the projects coming before ACUS Committees this fall, and how to stream recordings of […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review: Reviewed – Amtrak Arbitration

The D.C. Circuit issued only one opinion last week: Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. In 2017, the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (“the Union”) filed a complaint in federal district court arguing that Amtrak had violated their collective bargaining agreement by refusing to say that it would use Union-represented workers in a […]

Notice & Comment

The Regulatory Pendulum

Last week National Affairs journal published my essay on “The Regulatory Pendulum”. The article primarily concerns the topic of regulations that are issued and revoked as new Presidential administrations replace previous ones. It is available here.

Notice & Comment

The Limits of Generative AI in Administrative Law Research, by Susan Azyndar

When I began experimenting with Lexis+AI in my administrative law research course this past spring, we found it ineffective for questions beyond the C.F.R. For example, asking for a recent IRS private letter ruling kept pulling up rulings from the last century, and no prompt seemed able to come up with EEOC policy documents. Why did […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Emergency Powers for Good,” by Elena Chachko and Katerina Linos

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Emergency Powers for Good,” by Elena Chachko and Katerina Linos, which is forthcoming in the William & Mary Law Review. Here is the abstract: Emergency powers are widely, and justly, criticized as threats to the rule of law. In the United States, forty-three declared emergencies give the executive […]

Notice & Comment

Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, August 2024 Edition

Here is the August 2024 Edition of the most-downloaded recent papers (those announced in the last 60 days) from SSRN’s U.S. Administrative Law eJournal, which is edited by Bill Funk. For more on why SSRN and this eJournal are such terrific resources for administrative law scholars and practitioners, check out my first post on the subject here. You can […]

Notice & Comment

Ranking the Big Tech Monopolization Cases in the Wake of the Google Search Decision: Perspectives of Some Economists and Legal Scholars, by Daniel J. Gilman & Brian C. Albrecht

In April, we published a short piece in Notice & Comment on 5 key monopolization cases in the tech sector. In it, we presented the results of an informal poll of economists with expertise in antitrust. The poll asked them to rate the strength of the government’s cases by providing both stand-alone ratings and relative ones. Here, we […]

Notice & Comment

No, Jarkesy will not Flood the Courts, by Keelyn Gallagher & Adi Dynar

What do Elon Musk, Jamie Leach, Frank Black, and Jeffrey Moats have in common? Elon Musk is fighting the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) power grab. Jamie Leach is fighting to save her company from the whims of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Frank Black is fighting against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) so he can keep working in […]

Notice & Comment

Backing Universal Remedies Into a Corner (Post), by Alisa Klein

Reflecting on the litigation over the FTC’s non-compete rule, it struck me that the Supreme Court’s decision in Corner Post is a huge win for the government masquerading as a loss. A key sentence in the opinion should put the last nail in the coffin of universal remedies. If I’m right about this prediction, Corner Post’s implications for […]

Notice & Comment

Climate Investment and Sovereign Wealth Funds: A Tale of Legal Reconciliation, by Alissa Ardito Ashcroft & Faiz Sait

More low carbon or green investment is needed to achieve the Paris Agreement’s objective of net-zero emission by 2050. To facilitate such green investment, both public and private funds must flow into emerging green technologies. When examining avenues to nudge corresponding investment in global markets, which in turn impacts trade, it is imperative to turn our attention to Sovereign […]