Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Does the Law Ever Run Out?,” by Charles Capps & “Pragmatics and Textualism,” by Lawrence Solum

Today, the Ad Law Reading Room generously delivers two entries. The first entry is “Does the Law Ever Run Out?,” by Charles F. Capps. The second is “Pragmatics and Textualism,” by Lawrence B. Solum. Here is Capps’ abstract: Although laypeople commonly believe that a judge’s job is to decide every case as the law requires, […]

Notice & Comment

Remedying Appointment Clause Violations:  Special Counsels (Part III)

This is the third of three posts assessing Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of an indictment against Donald Trump and his two co-conspirators because Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed as a special counsel.  This three-part series has focused on the appropriateness of the Judge’s wholesale invalidation of the Special Counsel’s action. As noted in my initial […]

Notice & Comment

Remedying Appointment Clause Violations:  Special Counsels (Part II)

This is the second of three posts assessing Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of an indictment against Donald Trump and two co-conspirators upon finding the Attorney General’s appointment of Jack Smith violated the Appointments Clause.  This three-part series assumes that Judge Cannon correctly decided the constitutional question and, instead, assesses the appropriateness of the Judge’s wholesale […]

Notice & Comment

Remedying Appointment Clause Violations:  Special Counsels (Part I)

“[T]he aspiration to effective individual remediation for every constitutional violation represents an important remedial principle, but not an unqualified command.”  Richard H. Fallon, Jr. & Daniel J. Meltzer, New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies, 104 Harv. L. Rev. 1731, 1789 (1991) Judge Aileen Cannon recently dismissed an indictment against Donald Trump and two co-conspirators upon […]

Notice & Comment

ACUS Update: New Opportunities to Work with ACUS, Four New Recommendations Adopted & ACUS Hosts Public Forum Series on Recent SCOTUS Administrative Law Decisions

It’s been an exciting and productive summer here at the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). Read on to learn more about the Conference’s recent activities, including the launch of four new research projects, the adoption of four new recommendations, and our recently concluded public forum, which brought together academics and practitioners from across […]

Notice & Comment

The FCC is Running Out of Time for a Spectrum “Win,” by Lawrence J. Spiwak

Spectrum is the lifeblood of the commercial wireless industry.  Today, spectrum is incredibly scarce as most of the available spectrum is already allocated for assorted uses.  With spectrum in short supply yet in high demand by telecommunications operators, federal policy must focus on identifying bands that can be used more efficiently; this is especially the case as […]

Notice & Comment

Ninth Circuit Review-Reviewed: FVRA Eviscerated (albeit less so than in other circuits)

In mid-July, a divided Ninth Circuit panel rendered the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) a “near dead letter,” to quote from Judge Morgan Christen’s dissent. Before we get to the majority’s decision, let’s start with the backstory. The Constitution, of course, requires high-level officers to be appointed by the President with the “advice and consent” […]

Notice & Comment

The Fifth Circuit, in the Post-Chevron Era, Rejects Regulations to Implement the No Surprises Act, by Stuart Silverman            

On August 2, 2024, in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. United States Dept. of Health and Human Services, et al. (“Texas Medical”), the Fifth Circuit ruled that the Final Rule promulgated in 2022 by three separate federal agencies under different statutes exceeded statutory authority under the No Surprises Act (“NSA” or “the Act”).     In rendering its […]

Notice & Comment

Fifth Circuit Review–Reviewed: Nondelegation Bonanza

Welcome to your monthly recap of administrative law from the Fifth Circuit! By my count, the Court issued ten published opinions in administrative law cases last month. I’ll focus on three of those cases here. For the rest, I’ll limit myself to the key takeaways. Private Nondelegation in the Regulation of Horseracing Up first we […]

Notice & Comment

The Right to a Human Regulator?

With the Supreme Court considering SEC v. Jarkesy last Term, much of the administrative law field debated whether federal agencies should be able to adjudicate disputes in house, or whether some disputes must be tried by a jury in an Article III federal court. The Supreme Court ultimately held that the U.S. Constitution provides a […]

Notice & Comment

ABA Adlaw Section Report to the President-Elect on “Improving the Administrative Process”

In the summer of 2016, the ABA Section of Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice prepared and approved a report with recommendations to the next President-Elect, titled “Improving the Administrative Process”.  The recommendations of that 2016 report remain of interest, and the report remains available online, here, as well as at 69 Administrative Law Review 205-224 (Winter […]

Notice & Comment

Guidance for the Post-Chevron World, by Jordan Ascher, Will Dobbs-Allsopp, and Rachael Klarman

Notice & Comment readers have, by now, gotten a range of views on the effect of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo on administrative agencies’ authority. One thing many agree on, though, is that only time will tell the decision’s true impact. Our organization, Governing for Impact, has released an issue brief offering guidance to policymakers on how to understand […]