Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “The Beleaguered Sovereign: Judicial Restraints on Public Enforcement,” by Luke P. Norris and Helen Hershkoff, which is forthcoming in the Texas Law Review. Here is the abstract: Looking back at the federal courts over the last generation, commentators will likely focus on their role in undermining the functioning […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Resurrecting the Trinity of Legislative Constitutionalism,” by Beau Baumann, which is forthcoming in the Yale Law Journal. Here is the abstract: For generations, scholars have called on Congress to counter the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. They argue that a congressional OLC could safeguard Congress’s prerogatives […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Emergency Powers for Good,” by Elena Chachko and Katerina Linos, which is forthcoming in the William & Mary Law Review. Here is the abstract: Emergency powers are widely, and justly, criticized as threats to the rule of law. In the United States, forty-three declared emergencies give the executive […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Working with Statutes,” by Anya Bernstein and Cristina Rodríguez, which is forthcoming in the Texas Law Review. Here is the abstract: In its 2024 decision overruling the decades-old Chevron doctrine directing judges to accept an agency’s reasonable interpretation of ambiguous statutory language, the Supreme Court declares: “agencies have […]
Today, the Ad Law Reading Room generously delivers two entries. The first entry is “Does the Law Ever Run Out?,” by Charles F. Capps. The second is “Pragmatics and Textualism,” by Lawrence B. Solum. Here is Capps’ abstract: Although laypeople commonly believe that a judge’s job is to decide every case as the law requires, […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Nondelegation, Original Meaning, and Early Federal Taxation: A Dialogue With My Critics,” by Nicholas R. Parrillo, which was recently published by the Drake Law Review and posted to SSRN. (Note that the SSRN version includes an online-only appendix containing further dialogue. Parrillo also blogged about aspects of the […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Presidential Control and Administrative Capacity,” by Nicholas Bednar, which is forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review. Here is the abstract: Presidential control is the power to direct administrative capacity toward the president’s own policy objectives. Accordingly, presidential power vis-à-vis administrative policymaking has two necessary components: control and capacity. […]
I’m currently writing an article tentatively titled “Statutory Liquidation,” which is about courts use of post-enactment practice or understanding to settle statutory meaning.* I was particularly interested, then, when in Loper Bright the Court not only cited Skidmore with seeming approval, but repeatedly emphasized the “respect” traditionally afforded to longstanding, consistent agency interpretations, especially when […]
Today was a big administrative law day at the Supreme Court. And while Jarkesy was the more anticipated opinion, I found myself most interested by Ohio v. EPA, which stayed enforcement of an EPA rule designed to control ozone pollution that crosses state lines. The decision was 5-4, with Justice Gorsuch writing for the majority […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Petition Power,” by Erika Lietzan, which is forthcoming in the American University Law Review. Here is the abstract: The law cannot be kept secret. We cannot comply with rules that we do not know. Nor can we question their legitimacy, which is both our right and our duty […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “The Past and Future of Universal Vacatur,” by Mila Sohoni, which was recently published by the Yale Law Journal and posted to SSRN. Here is the abstract: Universal vacatur, the judicial power to void a regulation, is a remedy rooted in the foundations of modern administrative law, not […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Ghostwriting Federalism,” by Adam Zimmerman, which was recently published by the Yale Law Journal and posted to SSRN. Here is the abstract: Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s admonition that federal authorities should not “unduly interfere” with state government, federal agencies frequently write state laws. They draft model state acts. […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “After Courts: Democratizing Statutory Law,” by Ryan D. Doerfler & Samuel Moyn, which is forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review. Here is the abstract: In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton argued for locating interpretive authority over law separately from those institutions tasked with formulating it. Hamilton’s vision, never […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Public Patent Powers,” by Laura Dolbow (soon to be of Colorado Law), which is forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review. Here is the abstract: Congress has created multiple structures for agencies to control how patents are used, but that institutional design choice has received little academic attention. This […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “FDA Leads, States Must Follow,” by Catherine M. Sharkey and Daniel J. Kenny, which is forthcoming in the Washington University Law Review. Here is the abstract: As deference to administrative agencies has steadily come under attack, the FDA is a desert oasis. Courts have long deferred to the […]