Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, October 2018 Edition

by Christopher J. Walker — Thursday, Nov. 29, 2018@chris_j_walker

Here is the October 2018 Edition of the most-downloaded recent papers (those announced in the last 60 days) from SSRN’s U.S. Administrative Law eJournal, which is edited by Bill Funk.

  1. ‘Faithful Execution’ and Article II by Andrew Kent, Ethan J. Leib & Jed Handelsman Shugerman (Harvard Law Review forthcoming) [CJW Note: This is a fascinating deep historical dive into what “faithful execution” of the law means, concluding that the Take Care Clause subordinates the President to Congress in many ways.]


  1. Does the Supreme Court Really Not Apply Chevron When It Should? by Natalie Salmanowitz & Holger Spamann [CJW Note: As I’ve already blogged about here, this study is a fascinating replication of the seminal Eskridge-Baer study of Chevron deference at the Supreme Court.]


  1. Understanding State Agency Independence by Miriam Seifter (Michigan Law Review forthcoming) [CJW Note: Seifter is one of the most creative and fun reads in the adlaw field by looking to state administrative law, the role of interest groups, etc., and this paper is no exception. I’ve heard her present previous drafts of this paper at both the Third Annual New Administrative Law Scholarship Roundtable and the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention.]


  1. Deconstructing the Administrative State: Constitutional Debates over Chevron and Political Transformation in American Law by Craig Green [CJW Note: 100+ pages arguing against the recent attacks on Chevron deference, with the following bottom line: “To overrule Chevron would be the most radical decision about constitutional structure in eighty years, unsettling hundreds of judicial decisions, thousands of statutes, and countless agency decisions.”]


  1. The Claims of Official Reason: Administrative Guidance on Social Inclusion by Blake Emerson (Yale Law Journal forthcoming) [CJW Note: Emerson is an important newer voice in the field, and this article is a nice example of why. In this article, he argues that some agency guidance can create legally cognizable interests that have to be taken into account when an agency attempts to rescind that guidance.]


  1. Visual Rulemaking by Elizabeth G. Porter and Kathryn A. Watts (48 Environmental Law Reporter 10,698 (2018)) [CJW Note: This is a nice, shorter adaptation of Porter and Watts’ important full-length NYU Law Review article on how agencies use visuals when regulation.]


  1. In Defense of a Little Judiciary: A Textual and Constitutional Foundation for Chevron by T.J. McCarrick (San Diego Law Review forthcoming) [CJW Note: Here’s another defense of Chevron deference, responding to the statutory interpretation and constitutional attacks that have been raised.]


  1. Due Process for Article III—Rethinking Murray’s Lessee by Kent H. Barnett (George Mason Law Review forthcoming) [CJW Note: Here’s my frequent collaborator, arguing that we should rethink the public-rights exception to Article III adjudication. I need to grapple more with Kent’s argument here in the next draft of my latest essay on the constitutional tensions in agency adjudication.]


  1. Congress and the Executive: Challenging the Anti-Regulatory Narrative by Richard L. Revesz [CJW Note: As one would expect from Revesz, this is an important and smart read. I’m generally in favor of some regulatory reform legislation, but I agree there are dangers with regulatory reform if it is not accompanied by a return to regular legislative activity. Jonathan Adler and I are currently working on a paper that explores that issue in greater detail and calls for Congress to re-engage in a regular reauthorization process.]


  1. Judge Kavanaugh, Lorenzo v. SEC, and the Future of Deference at the Post-Kennedy Supreme Court by Matthew C. Turk & Karen E. Woody (Administrative Law Review forthcoming) [CJW Note: This is an interesting, deep dive into an adlaw case pending before the Supreme Court, one in which Kavanaugh is recused yet wrote a lengthy dissent while on the D.C. Circuit.]


For more on why SSRN and this eJournal are such terrific resources for administrative law scholars and practitioners, check out my first post on the subject here. You can check out the full rankings, updated daily, here.

Thanks to my terrific research assistant Sam Lioi for helping put together this monthly post. I’ll report back in December with the next edition.

Cite As: Author Name, Title, 36 Yale J. on Reg.: Notice & Comment (date), URL.

This entry was categorized in AdLaw Bridge Series and tagged , .

About Christopher J. Walker

Christopher Walker is a law professor at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. Prior to joining the law faculty, Professor Walker clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court and worked on the Civil Appellate Staff at the U.S. Department of Justice. His publications have appeared in the California Law Review, Michigan Law Review, Stanford Law Review, and University of Pennsylvania Law Review, among others. Outside the law school, he serves as one of forty Public Members of the Administrative Conference of the United States and as Chair-Elect of the American Bar Association’s Section on Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice. He blogs regularly at the Yale Journal on Regulation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *