Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Ranking the Big Tech Monopolization Cases: Some Economists’ Perspectives, by Brian C. Albrecht & Daniel J. Gilman

Antitrust scrutiny of “big tech” is hardly new, but the Justice Department’s recent monopolization case against Apple caps an unprecedented federal antitrust offensive against major tech firms. There are at least five open monopolization matters, beginning with the DOJ’s 2020 Google search complaint, and followed by cases against Facebook/Meta, Amazon, a second case against Google […]

Notice & Comment

Yet Another Way To Rebut Major Questions Doctrine Challenges, by Reed Shaw

In a spirit similar to that of recent great posts in this forum, this blog post suggests yet another way agencies can preemptively insulate certain rules from Major Questions Doctrine (MQD) challenges. In particular, we focus on how overlapping federal, state and international regulatory regimes may reduce the incremental costs of rulemakings, and therefore weigh against a finding […]

Notice & Comment

“Digital Discrimination” Kills Low-Income Broadband Discount Plans, by Dr. George S. Ford

Prior to the COVID pandemic, most broadband service providers (“BSPs”) offered heavily discounted but capable internet plans to lower-income households for about $10 to $15 per month.  Dissatisfied with these market-based solutions, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (“IIJA”) established the “Affordable Connectivity Program” or “ACP.”  Under the ACP, the federal government provides a $30 per month […]

Notice & Comment

A Particularly Noteworthy Denial of Administrative Reconsideration in the Good Neighbor Rule Case, by Megan M. Herzog & Sean H. Donahue

There has been a quiet but noteworthy development in the litigation of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Good Neighbor Rule—adding a new administrative law wrinkle to a case with already big administrative law implications. On February 21, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on a set of stay applications, consolidated under Ohio v. EPA, that ask the Court to block […]

Notice & Comment

We Have Been Looking in the Wrong Place for the Meaning of “Set Aside” Under the APA

A vigorous debate recently has emerged over whether the APA authorizes federal courts to vacate agency action on judicial review. Perhaps because this debate is an outgrowth of the longer-running dispute over “nationwide” or “universal” injunctions, it is operating on the premise that vacatur is a remedy, like an injunction or a declaratory judgment. I’m […]

Notice & Comment

Nominations Are Open for the 2024 ABA Administrative Law Section Awards!

Take a look at the award deadlines provided below to get detailed information about the requirements and guidelines. Gellhorn-Sargentich Law Student Essay Award Competition Created in 2006, the Gellhorn-Sargentich Law Student Essay Award Competition honors the memory of two men who left us too soon, Ernest Gellhorn, a distinguished law dean, administrative law professor, and […]

Notice & Comment

Another Way to Rebut Major Questions Arguments, by Todd Phillips and Beau J. Baumann

Earlier this week, Max Sarinsky published an excellent piece about how agencies could get ahead of major questions doctrine (MQD) challenges to new rules. That blog post, which drew heavily from Sarinsky’s new law review article with Richard Revesz, argues that agencies should follow the lead of the Environmental Protection Agency and articulate specific regulatory antecedents to […]

Notice & Comment

Rediscovering and Realizing the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle, by Kevin Frazier

Our constitutional order contains an “anti-power-accumulation principle.” This principle has three components: first, power must be formally and functionally exercised exclusively by the intended actor–be it the state or federal government, one of the branches within those respective governments, or the people, whether as individuals or acting through a formal or informal association, such as a corporation; second, there […]

Notice & Comment

Ranking the Big Tech Monopolization Cases, by Daniel A. Crane

The Justice Department’s March 21, 2024 monopolization lawsuit against Apple implements the last piece of an agreement reached between the FTC and DOJ in June of 2019 ceding Facebook/Meta and Amazon to the FTC and Google and Apple to the DOJ. There was never much of a question about whether the federal agencies and their state Attorney General counterparts would launch […]

Notice & Comment

Agency Action, Agency Failure to Act, and Universal Relief in Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, by John Harrison

Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,[1] recently argued in the Supreme Court, mainly concerns the limitations period for judicial review of agency decisions. The case also raises issues about administrative law remedies, which came up briefly at the argument. Important for both sets of issues is that Corner Post, a private […]

Notice & Comment

This Is How To Rebut Major Questions Arguments, by Max Sarinsky

In a forthcoming law review article, Richard Revesz and I contend that agencies should preemptively rebut challenges under the major questions doctrine by drawing parallels to past agency actions. A recent federal regulation offers a template for this analysis.  In its pollution standards for new vehicles issued last week, the Environmental Protection Agency extensively responded to claims that […]